Leadership Coach Picked Up the Phone. Refused to Explain. Closed $50,000 Client.

Alzay CalhounCoveted Consultant · 5 min read

Joan Lawrence-Ross, a leadership coach and founder of Uncommon Resilience LLC, knew she was excellent at what she did. Decades of experience helping senior executives navigate high-stakes situations. A track record of real results.

But every time she sat down with a potential client, she worked too hard.

She'd walk them through her capabilities, her methodology, her range of services. By the time she finished, the energy in the conversation had shifted. The person across from her wasn't recognizing their own problem anymore. They were grading her presentation.

As she described it, she was constantly "chasing the client to get business." Every engagement required her to do all the heavy lifting in the conversation, and she sensed there had to be a better way.

What Was Actually Going On

Joan described herself as a "network thinker," someone who sees 50 steps ahead the moment one idea lands. In a sales conversation, that meant she was always tempted to show the full picture before the prospect had even described what they were looking at.

She'd present fully developed solutions before the prospect had articulated their need. She was trying to communicate her value by covering every angle, and in doing so, she was taking on pressure that didn't belong to her.

As she reflected later: "I thought I was clear on my offering until your questions told me I wasn't." Joan's services were broad: executive coaching, corporate retreats, leadership development across multiple topics. She could do many things well. But "many things" doesn't give a prospect anything to recognize themselves in.

The core issue was that she was trying to sell everything she could do instead of choosing one problem to name and letting the right people come forward.

What Happened

Joan joined an 8-week group coaching program where the central exercise forced her to examine her client history through four filters: who paid the highest fees, who worked with her the longest, who showed the most measurable success, and who expressed the most gratitude.

But before the pattern could emerge, Joan had to confront what she'd been doing wrong. She came into the program trying to productize her topics. Leadership coaching, leadership development, leadership improvement, corporate retreats. Each topic felt like a separate offering that needed its own packaging. She was trying to put shape around everything she knew and everything she could do.

As she described it: "I was ready to sell but my products were not clear to me either. So that's why it was so hard for me to sell. I had to back up."

The program stripped away what was essential from what wasn't. And what Joan discovered was that she'd been working from the wrong direction. She was packaging her knowledge when she should have been understanding what the client was trying to solve. The topics were limitless. But the problems her best clients brought to her weren't. They were specific, and they repeated.

A pattern emerged. Joan's greatest impact wasn't in broad leadership development. It was in one specific moment: helping executives prepare for high-stakes conversations. Board meetings. Difficult negotiations. Career-defining presentations. That was the problem her best clients were trying to solve.

Once she saw it, her job changed. She didn't need to explain her full range of expertise. She needed to name that problem simply enough that the right person could recognize themselves in it.

This required discipline. Joan's instinct was to explore every direction at once: "When you are forcing me to not think of the other 49 steps, but stick with step number one, I wanted to go two, three, four, five, six, seven, all the way down." But her new job wasn't to explain. It was to describe the problem and let the prospect decide if they saw themselves in it.

The first test came on a call Joan hadn't planned as a sales conversation at all.

Joan reached out to a former contact for a routine check-in. During the conversation, she briefly mentioned her new offering, helping mid-level managers who struggle with difficult conversations.

She barely got the description out.

The executive, a C-suite leader, interrupted. He didn't need an explanation. He recognized his own problem in what Joan described and pulled the solution toward himself. Board meetings. That's where he struggled. He said: "I can use that."

Joan proposed a $5,000 engagement. The client immediately doubled it to $10,000 without hesitation: "No, I'll pay you 10." That engagement expanded into a $50,000 contract. The client insisted on paying in full upfront.

Joan's reflection afterward: "I got off and I'm like, what just happened? Seriously... It was meant to be a check-in call, and the next thing I knew, I was closing a deal."

"I said, typically I charge $5K for this. You know what he said? I'll pay you $10K."

— Joan Lawrence-Ross

The Results

The $50,000 engagement was the headline number. But the deeper result was what Joan learned about how sales conversations actually work.

She didn't close that deal by explaining her expertise. She described a problem simply enough that the person across from her recognized himself in it, and then he did the work of connecting it to his own situation. He expanded the engagement before it started and was already talking about additional areas he wanted to address.

Joan also gained a realization that reshaped how she thought about pricing: "I value the problem. If it's a $5 problem, I'm giving you a $5 price. If it's a million dollar problem, you better bet your life, I'm gonna charge you a million dollars."

Perhaps most importantly, Joan stopped chasing. As she put it: "Just because I can do it doesn't mean I need to do it, have to do it, or should do it."

What This Demonstrates

Joan's story shows the difference between explaining your way to a sale and creating the conditions for a prospect to recognize themselves.

When a consultant leads with expertise, the prospect's job becomes evaluation. They're grading a presentation. The consultant does all the work and the prospect holds all the judgment.

When a consultant names a problem simply and clearly, the dynamic reverses. The prospect hears the problem and either sees themselves in it or they don't. If they do, they lean forward. They're not evaluating a presentation. They're solving their own problem with you as the vehicle.

The cost of explaining is that you carry the entire conversation. The power of naming the problem is that the right person carries it for you. Read More -> How Real Experts Attract the Best Clients

Find Your Best Work.

You've done the work. You've gotten the results. You just haven't had a way to organize what you know so it's ready when the moment arrives.

Let's fix that together. It starts with one conversation.

Join the Waiting List →